Snuff, by definition, establishes its very existence upon interaction
with the viewer; it is the most blatant form of collusion: the death within
the film is caused by you, the viewer, because you have created the market,
the desire for this product.
Why do we deny it? It is typical. We have neutrality, quarantine, madhouses,
leper colonies, jails, schools, electric fences. We define ourselves not
by our connections but by our boundaries. We become confused when these
boundaries crack and seep, when our distinctions swallow themselves whole.
Without the zoo, we are all animals.
Film, as a concept is the most unblemished example of this ethic, packaged
as an actual and complete enclosure, providing the convenient delivery of
fantasy without repercussions. Film is one of the most convenient of these
packages, a means by which we escape reality simply to return and reconfirm
it. It is the delivery of fantasy without guilt. So we are stunned by this
intrusion of film on death, the blatancy by which the monster reveals its
true nature to be that of child: societal responsibility.
Our problem with snuff is this: We want to see death; we don't want to be
responsible for it.
Snuff states that we are, in a subtle and indirect way, responsible for
all deaths and, explicitly, for the death that is placed immediately before
our eyes. It also states that death is entertaining, particularly when it
is brutal, mutilating, cruel, when it is real.
Neither of these are things we would like to acknowledge about ourselves.
We want to be the angels floating up above, engrossed in the destruction
beneath, superior, airborne, guiltless.
0 1 2